There are two sides of the coin in the case of the talk, should college athletes be paid pros and cons. The following article, we take care of either one of them, individually.
The assumption that faculty athletes shouldn’t have promising careers and they also shouldn’t be encouraged to play is not any more valid. Nowadays, there are career opportunities in sports although the contest is equally high. Should college athletes be paid to play? This can be a question that should be answered far more by school management teams than by another individual. Because of numerous aspects contained in the question, ‘should college athletes be paid pros and cons’, we have to think over it. There are some prominent benefits of awarding athletic scholarships to school athletes but at the flip side, there are some demerits too. Without observing either one of these viewpoints, it isn’t possible to achieve to apt conclusion in this raging debate.
Should College Athletes Receives a commission: Pros
It’s a proven fact that all work and no play makes jack a lifeless boy. If students usually are not encouraged to take part in activities beyond academics, they may not experience holistic growth. It’s important for the total development of personality to advertise sports in colleges. While thinking deeply over the question, should college athletes be paid pros and cons, we need to consider the truth that not all students are equal in academics and this doesn’t suggest they do not put efforts in studies. Some students are inherently inclined towards another pursuits. Here, as per our interest, it’s sports. It’s some other thing – can be music, art, singing, etc. Hence, isn’t it fair enough to let students get exposed to various experiences and decide what suits them best. If someone could be a great soccer player, why should he try and become a chemical engineer? Hence, it is very important promote talents and which might be achieved by paying to school athletes who show promising talents.
Besides that faculty sports is not only a regional affair now. Local athletes and players act as representatives for his or her respective cities and places. They’re like sources from which talents are born and gradually they battle in national and international arena. We all know it is a difficult journey but mind you, it’s not an impossible task.
The way of thinking of faculty management teams should be of balancing sports and studies. If that could be a reason not enough to advertise scholarships for college kids, consider this. There are various financial gains that include promoting local sports and athletes. College games are still a favourite national past-time of most Americans, who like to spend their weekends enjoying some hours of baseball or American football games. The gang these students attract and the revenue generated is right enough for schools to kick start several important projects. If nothing, it adds to college revenue.
Another argument that should be discussed is that faculty athletes act as a source of selling for billion dollar super bowl matches. If the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) is in a position to earn revenues tunes to billions, sponsored by biggies like Pepsi, FedEx, it is sensible to pay college athletes. In the end, when schools and colleges makes huge revenue through college athletics programs, it is smart to pay them some fees for entertainment and education purposes. Not paying college athletes may be taken as exploitation by schools and colleges.
When there’s a heated debate on should college athletes be paid pros and cons, supporters of salaries for varsity athletes argue that, college scholarships, though propagated by schools and colleges to be sufficient for college kids, seriously isn’t always plentiful for them.
Should College Athletes Receives a commission: Cons
Another aspect to take a look at the question ‘should college athletes be paid pros and cons’, we have to rethink of the sports which are popular in US. Basketball, soccer, American football..umm.. well the list ends. It’s these 3 sports that folk are frantic about in US. These are the sports careers which have the best potential of bling, glamor and money. Except these, minority sports don’t seem to be promoted to an enormous extent. The issues with the various schools and colleges is that aside from these 3 sports, it isn’t easy to pay college athletes for each sport that isn’t so popular. So, in the event that they pay for three sports and ignore others, it’s surely an open invitation to divisiveness. Money generated in minority sports is generally not enough to even fund salaries of players. So as to avoid the headache, many faculties don’t keep any fee for varsity athletes.
One of many main arguments given against paying money to faculty athletes is if athletes in college are paid, they could not more be amateurs. Salary caps are for pro players and never for faculty athletes. Also many sports coaches and students argue that paying money to school athletes can get them all for poor sportsmanship conduct as they might lose focus from sports, at ages after they must solely deal with developing their skills.
People against college athletic salaries also support their viewpoint by the argument that almost all of the athletic scholarships given to students are already sufficient to offer compensation to varsity athletes. With the assistance of college scholarships, college players may be able to support their studies, pay for tuition, hostel, books, meals and housing facilities. If all needs of school athletes are being met by scholarships, it’s unfair to grant them some salaries and expose them to professional world at an immature age.
After reading both aspects at the question, ‘should college athletes be paid pros and cons’, you could have gotten some idea concerning the scenario. As for my vote, i feel it’s certainly justifiable to allot some money for faculty athletes. Though, it should not be whooping salaries like those of wealthy football club players, but certainly some monetary support can go some distance in encouraging college athletes.